Social darwinism essay example

It has appeared necessary to devote some space to this subject, inasmuch as that usually acute writer Sir Henry Maine has accepted the word " tenure " in its modern interpretation, and has built up a theory under which the Irish chief " developed " into a feudal baron. I can find nothing in the Brehon laws to warrant this theory of social Darwinism, and believe further study will show that the Cain Saerrath and the Cain Aigillue relate solely to what we now call chattels, and did not in any way affect what we now call the freehold, the possession of the land. In fact, Spencer was not described as a social Darwinist until the s, long after his death. Hofstadter later also recognized what he saw as the influence of Darwinist and other evolutionary ideas upon those with collectivist views, enough to devise a term for the phenomenon, "Darwinist collectivism".

Social darwinism essay example

The following essays were submitted by students. Small Planet Communications takes no responsibility for the opinions or content expressed in the essays.

To demonstrate or prove to be just, right, or valid.


To declare free of blame, absolve. In that case when you have to justify something it must not be right in the first place. Hitler used social Darwinism to justify his ideas of hate and the killing of millions of Jews.

What he did was undisputedly wrong. Had what he done been right, why would there be a need to justify it? The Social darwinism essay example social Darwinism is so vague that it can be used to defend the arguments of people with such different viewpoints.

Even to someone like Adolf Hitler. When Darwin stated his he was studying animals in nature, not human Nature. These theories apply to humans in the sense that we physically undergo changes to cope with our environment.

War is not natural selection, this is something that man has brought on each other, nature has nothing to do with this. Humans are intelligent enough that we do not need to compete against each other for land or food. Social Darwinism is used to justify a king who wants more land that already has too much, or a bigger throne to sit on.

A sickly person can fire cannon at the enemy with swords, but the people wielding swords and wearing more armor are obviously in better physical condition.

Now just because the civilization with cannons has better technology doesn't mean they are better. They are sick and will eventually die off.

Now if they didn't kill each other and were peaceful and mixed the two gene pools they would have a race superior to what one of them where. First of all he states that of the great ideas of mankind is liberty.

How is taking over and forcing your beliefs on others follow the idea of liberty? The ideas that Christianity preaches are getting along with your fellow man not taking them over.

The other passage is applying to all nations and peoples, but this section is being applied only to Christian Americans. The idea Strong proposes has nothing to with nature, but deals with what America will have to do to keep expanding.

It stated that, basically, it was survival of the fittest. The weak diminished and eventually all died, and the strong got more power and continued to grow. The argument for social Darwinism is similar to the principles of Darwin's theory because it says in the very beginning that the nations are in a struggle for survival, the advanced people will prosper, while the weaker ones will eventually die off.

I found the in Josiah Strong's argument to be logical, although I don't think that we're going to be the only civilization to outnumber all the others. It differs from the other argument because Josiah is saying that we'll just take over everything and the other argument is saying that all the weaker civilizations will die off.

Josiah is just using this for a reason to expand. It follows Darwin's line of reasoning because Josiah is saying that the United States is one of the strongest countries, so it will prosper and grow stronger while the other countries, the weaker ones, will die off.

In my opinion, I do believe that Social Darwinism is how things work these days.

Social darwinism essay example

If your rich then you got it made, if not then oh well.Social Darwinism: The Best Approach Essay Sample. During and after the Gilded Age, because of the great changes of Industrialization, the American government’s involvement in regulating the business world was a hotbed of controversial debate.

Examples of Social Darwinism include believing one ethnic group or race superior to others, and objection to efforts supporting humanitarian assistance for all, such as government welfare programs.

Examples of Social Darwinism include believing one ethnic group or race superior to others, and objection to efforts supporting humanitarian assistance for all, such as government welfare programs.

Social Darwinism essentially prescribes the theories of natural selection, adopted by Charles Darwin, to humans and aspects of human society, such as economics and politics.

Effects of Social Darwinism Essay Words | 12 Pages. Introduction The Effects of Social Darwinism on the social trends of the 19th century. “As a world view, Darwinism cannot of course be refuted, since Faith is, always has been, and always will be, stronger than facts.

Social Darwinism is a concept that can be applied to both the natural world and the society of humans that reside on Earth.

How to cite this page

This concept can be best described as the survival of the fittest theory. Those who are the strong will go on to pursue life and leave the weak behind. Darwinism has come in 3/5(5). For example, The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics states: While Malthus's work does not itself qualify as social Darwinism, his work An Essay on the Principle of Population, was incredibly popular and widely read by social Darwinists.

In that book, for example.

Social Darwinism Essay ⋆ Political Science Essay Examples ⋆ EssayEmpire